Whatever happened to you have to defend your belt to be the
champ? I didn’t make this term up, it’s been going around since boxing in its heyday. So, why are people talking about Miesha Tate
– Holly Holm 2 is the fight to make. Did
Holly dominate all five rounds. Was this
a crazy split decision? Did Miesha Tate heel kick her vag four times before
sinking in the choke. When Miesha Tate
got Holly to the ground she had no answer.
She finished the fight, Holly went to sleep, there is no
controversy. The rematch doesn’t need to
happen. I can see people saying Lawler-Condit 2 has to happen because that
decision is determined on how you score that third round. That’s not the case here, the women who won,
is the won celebrating with the belt, and the person who lost woke up looking
depressed.
Holly Holm wasn’t a long standing champion she just beat
Ronda Rousey. It’s time to mix it up,
it’s time to get a fresh face in title contention. Remember the Light
Heavyweight division had a revolving door.
Did Forrest Griffin, Rampage Jackson, Lyoto Machida, or Rashad Evans get
an immediate rematch. NO!! Well, Shogun did but that’s because it was controversial
split decision against Machida.
Like any champion, you want to take on all comers, solidifying
that you are the best. To do that you
have to fight everyone in the division and clear it out. She isn’t ducking Holly because she just beat
Holly. Holly couldn’t defend her belt
one time. She doesn’t deserve a rematch
just because she beat Ronda Rousey. Just
because you beat Ronda Rousey doesn’t make you Ronda Rousey. Doesn’t make you a superstar. Her other two fights were not memorable. Just because you kicked one girl in the face
doesn’t make you a world beater. Rant
Over.
I'm TROLLING! I'M TROLLING!!
ReplyDeleteThanks for trolling. I appreciate the visit.
ReplyDelete